Yes,I have my own rights

Free Girl

Yes,I have my own rights/Soup for the Soul“Just because I am a girl doesn’t mean I am a thing to sell in the marriage market.”

Is this my fault that I am a girl? Why only girls needed to compromise in her life? Why my family provide each and everything to my husband’s family? Marriage is a compromise between two families; it’s a holly relationship between two souls. Marriage is not a business, it’s not a joke that I would marry to anyone who is totally stranger to me. Why people say that I can’t leave alone without marriage. After all marriage it’s just a part of life, not the whole life. I too wish to live in a society where marriage will create relations between two souls to fulfill the promises, not business deals.

Soup for the Soul India

Philosophical aritcle

 THE WEAK POINT DEALER

Bars & Cultures

bars in india

Bars & Cultures

Bars & Cultures-Over a long period of time the society’s evolution in terms of norms and thinking is very slow. Especially in a country like India which is very rich and diverse in cultural aspect, it takes a lot of time for the mentality of the people to evolve.

Bars and pubs have been existing in India since a very long time ago and it can traced back to the era of Aryan Civilization but then these were the places meant only for the men-folk.

Even today, the stereotype thinking has not grown much. Women seen hanging out in Pubs and Bars are not considered to be cultured. But the modern generation sees it differently. This is a good progress and a good sign for the girls. Finally, we are marching on the road to equality of men and women. So, let the party begin.

SOUP AND THE SOUL

SOUP FOR THE SOUL

Nanotechnology: The science of the Future

In 2016, three researchers achieved the Nobel for their work on the design of tiny molecular machines. Recently, the World Economic forum also referred nanotechnology as one of the top five leadership priorities of 2017. Imagine a 4000 square feet computer being compressed to a microprocessor having size lesser than 20 nanometres, approximately 100th time the width of your hair. That is the future we are currently living in. Throughout the world, we are experiencing smaller machines, tinier gadgets and more efficient technologies that empower our lives and make it easier and better.

Nanotechnology is a wonderful new technology in which scientists rearrange atoms and molecules of matter to nano specifications. The history of this technology dates back to more than sixty years when it was first proposed by the American Physicist Richard Feynman who delivered a lecture titled ‘There is plenty of Room at the Bottom’. Since then, the idea has inspired generations to pursue research into it. Eric Drexler took the idea forward to where we see it today.

In the past, there have been three major revolutions that have defined our course of history. The agricultural revolution marked the first ever use of machinery, albeit basic, to grow food for survival needs. Later, Industrial revolution resulted in the use of machines made by design. The information revolution brought us close to the use of digital, nanoscale devices, but it was used to process only information, not matter. What is unique about nanotechnology is that it encompasses the earlier three revolutions and combines the benefits of all. It employs artificial, molecular and nanoscale machinery that is used to process matter, real objects, and provides low cost, high value answers to human problems.

Nanotechnology offers amazing prospects to solve the critical problems of scarcity of resources that we face today. Consider the environmental problems that occur due to large scale manufacturing and toxic metal emissions which threaten the global climatic change, nanotechnology can grant us the solution by reducing resource consumption and supply us with infrastructure based on low cost solar energy and carbon neutral technologies. With nanotechnology, you can anticipate treating cancer, overcoming pathogens and virtually reshaping your body free from all pain and diseases. It also opens up the prospect of immortality. Nanotechnology might be the marking point of advancement of human species, much like it was when cognitive revolution separated us from our Neanderthal counterparts, 70,000 years before. It will transform labour, structure of our lives and our existence on Earth itself.

The applications of nanotechnology as a driver to future growth are immense. In the field of medicine, nanoparticles would be able to deliver drugs directly to cells, leading to more effective treatments to diseases. In the field of agriculture, nanomaterials will lead to remarkable difference in the food safety and health benefits that the food delivers. In space, use of more durable and lightweight aircrafts will make long distance space travel more realistic and drastically increase fuel efficiency. Furthermore, nanoparticles are also being developed which will have the capacity to undo the damage to the environment caused by carbon emissions. These nanobots will clean the industrial water pollutants, filter air through a process called ‘mechanical filtration’ and detect and remove chemical and bio-toxic pollutants with higher sensitivity than before. Overall, nanotechnology would lead to better air quality, cleaner air, lightweight cars, performance based products, more energy and more efficient lifestyles.

However, when one puts technology and future together, it offers a wide spectrum of possibilities; possibilities which can advance either ways-good or bad. There arises unanswerable questions and dubious answers, which are left open to the current generations to analyse. What path will such a technology follow? Would it lead us to higher construction or greater destruction? Such question can only be answered by analysing our experience with them in the past. It can be seen that the progress we have today was backed up by the technology of yesteryears, going back to Industrial revolution and then to irons and stones. At every stage, we faced a similar question, but we came out through it on a positive side. With the promises that nanotechnology provides us, we can only hope that it leads us to much better lives.

 

Why is Arvind Kejriwal so pessimistic?

The very essence of the establishment of Aam Aadmi party was to disparage the prevalent system of Governance and in process devise new alternatives or methods of governance that would be suitable to the country. When Kejriwal established the Aam Aadmi Party, he made it very clear that the prevailing system does not cater to the needs of the public and would be harmful in long run. Criticizing governance is not essentially a bad thing, as it exposes the ruling party and strives to create a better and a more conducive system of administration. However, what Kejriwal didn’t do was propose alternative methods to the existing system which he so publicly condoned. Critics are many, but those who actually provide a solution are the real leaders. Hence, many consider him pessimist for not providing results but merely mocking the government.

There can also be a counter point to this argument. Most of the times, we hear media (print or electronic) sensationalizing news to the point that it hardly seems realistic. Creating uproar in order to gather more views is a common ploy employed by most of the disseminators of news. Since most of the facts provided by AAP and Kejriwal are sensational in nature, exposing the dark sides of the government, they are disappointing and with media overstating them, people get a general tendency that Kejriwal is pessimist in nature, one who always criticizes the government.

Consider the recent example, Kejriwal has alleged that Modi has taken bribe to the tune of 12 Crores during his stint as Chief minister of Gujarat, thereby deriding the recent demonetization move by the PM. Since the move against black money (demonetization of 500 and 1000 rupee notes) has been considered to be a beneficial move, even if the allegations of Kejriwal are considered to be correct, they would still be regarded as pessimistic as it goes against the general tendency of people who believe Modi’s move against black money is favorable to the country.

The dictionary meaning of pessimism is to expect the worst in everything. It is a tendency to expect that no good will come out of a particular act.  Now, if one considers Kejriwal’s stance for the past four years, one can easily come to the conclusion that he has most of the times derided nearly every policy of the government, and that may be the reason why people consider him pessimistic.

Will the recent demonetization move by Modi stop corruption in India?

Indeed, demonetization is a bold move, but it is not enough to save India from the ever-rampant corruption in India. More time is therefore needed to see if the Modi government’s move would turn into a huge blow against corruption, the hard truth is that the corrupt and fraudulent won’t just conduct shady deals by using cash, but with gold, real estate and overseas assets. Corruption can be bred in a variety of ways. Blocking the circulation of large currency bills is without question far from enough

The recent move on demonetization has no doubt given a huge blow to corruption, as most illegal business is conducted in cash only. In that sense, the move is a risky but but bold and decisive step. Modi means well and had taken into account the fact that if the transactions in cash can be curbed, the intensity of illegal transactions would decrease immensely. His moves to tackle corruption and black money since taking office in 2014 has finally begun to scratch the surface and we can really expect some major policy reforms in the coming years from his government.

No doubt Modi’s demonetization drive has so far proven popular among increasingly aspirational voters who are tired of corruption, although views among the broader population and economists are divided over the efficacy and fairness of the move. It will go a long way in improving the chances of Modi government in the UP elections scheduled early next year.

It must also be kept in mind that delivering a corruption-free country requires more than banning currency notes. The key should be reforming systems. In this regard, India can learn a lot from China, where corruption is considered a serious crime with grave punishments. In fact, anti-corruption has been the focus of the Xi Jinping government since he took over as President in March 2013. Hundreds of officials have been purged – many for massive corruption, although some have also been seen to be political rivals.

Comparatively in India, where even a common man can figure out that most of the netas and babujis are corrupt, still no major actions are taken by the enforcement agencies.

So we must adopt more stringent polices towards corrupt individuals. In that regards, measures such as special courts given complete autonomy to deal with corruption cases may be taken by the government. Demonetization though a brilliant move must therefore be supported with other policy changes as well.

This article was originally published here.